This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schaffter, M. Articles by Debarbieux, B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Unbounded boundary studies and collapsed categories: rethinking spatial objects

Département de géographie, Université de Genève, Unimail, Boulevard du Pont d’Arve 40, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: marius.schaffter{at}unige.ch.

	Abstract

This paper is a response to Reece Jones’ ‘Categories, borders and boundaries’ (2009) that aims to give an alternate proposal to rethink geographical categories and boundary studies. First, it examines the various meanings of the word ‘category’ as used in Jones’ paper. We then stress the importance of the processes involved in constructing spatialized and unspatialized categories as a central issue for social sciences. Using different examples such as the city and the nation state, we finally argue that the triad of reification–naturalization–fetishization is a good tool to analyse the social construction of geographical categories and boundaries.

First published on July 8, 2009
Progress in Human Geography 2009, doi:10.1177/0309132509105009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?