Progress in Human Geography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for free access to the SAGE eReference platform!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Wrigley, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 21, No. 3, 338-358 (1997)
DOI: 10.1191/030913297674898950

Exit, the firm and sunk costs: reconceptualizing the corporate geography of disinvestment and plant closure

Gordon L. Clark

Neil Wrigley

School of Geography, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TB, UK; Department of Geography, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; St Peter's College, Oxford OX1 2DL, UK

The objective of this article is to reconceptualize understanding of the economic and spatial processes of corporate restructuring and market exit. We ask what economic logic explains plant closure and firms’ exit from industries, and develop a comprehensive perspective on the nature of the exit process focused on firms in which there is a separation of ownership and control, which are rich in capital assets and that are held hostage by their history and geography. Exit is treated as a sequence of related strategic decisions made by the firm regarding the use of its inherited configuration of capital, and we argue that there is an intimate connection between sunk costs and the logic of those decisions. The broader theoretical challenge addressed by the article concerns the provision of a coherent account of the spatial configuration of the firm in the context of the evolving world of corporate finance, corporate governance and capital specificity. These are important matters for economic geography.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
S. Christopherson
Barriers to 'US style' lean retailing: the case of Wal-Mart's failure in Germany
J. Econ. Geogr., July 1, 2007; 7(4): 451 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
A. Pike
'Shareholder value' versus the regions: the closure of the Vaux Brewery in Sunderland
J. Econ. Geogr., April 1, 2006; 6(2): 201 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
N. Wrigley, N. M. Coe, and A. Currah
Globalizing retail: conceptualizing the distribution-based transnational corporation (TNC)
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2005; 29(4): 437 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
M. C. White
Inward Investment, Firm Embeddedness and Place: An Assessment of Ireland's Multinational Software Sector
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2004; 11(3): 243 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. A. Melachroinos and N. Spence
Conceptualizing sunk costs in economic geography: cost recovery and the fluctuating value of fixed capital
Progress in Human Geography, September 1, 2001; 25(3): 347 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
H. D. Watts
Cross-Border Plant Closures in Context: Some Evidence from the UK
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2001; 8(3): 265 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]