| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Geography, paradox and environmental ethicsDepartment of Geography, 3611 Ellison Hall, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060, USA As a diverse and divided discipline, geography embodies tensions central to the para doxical nature of human dwelling on earth, from which questions of environmental ethics arise. The article reviews major ontological and epistemological tensions within geography – that between nature and culture, and objectivism and subjectivism – emphasizing the ways in which common resolutions to these tensions often represent flawed strategies of avoiding paradox. It then connects these tensions to important philosophical dimensions of environmental ethics. I argue that normative environmental ethics must be built on an adequate sensitivity to the nature/culture tension, and that environmental meta-ethics – specifically, the problem of relativism as applied to environmental discourse – must be similarly informed by the object/subject tension. The most fundamental contribution geography can make, therefore, lies in establishing a philosophical space for environmental ethics that takes paradox seriously and avoids its simplistic resolutions.
Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 22, No. 2,
234-255 (1998) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
 |
|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
