This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Crampton, J. W. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Maps as social constructions: power, communication and visualization

Department of Anthropology and Geography, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA

Two developments in cartography mark an epistemic break with the assumption that maps are unproblematic communication devices. These are 1) investigations of maps as practices of power-knowledge; and 2) ‘geographic visualization’ (GVis) which uses the map's power to explore, analyze and visualize spatial datasets to understand patterns better. These developments are key components of a ‘maps as social constructions’ approach, emphasizing the genealogy of power in mapping practices, and enabling multiple, contingent and exploratory perspectives of data. Furthermore, this approach is an opportunity for cartography to renew its relationship with a critical human geography.

Key Words: cartography–critical geography relationship • geographic visualization • Harley • maps as social constructions

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 25, No. 2, 235-252 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/030913201678580494


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Lammes Spatial Regimes of the Digital Playground: Cultural Functions of Spatial Practices in Computer Games Space and Culture, August 1, 2008; 11(3): 260 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]