This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mohan, G. Articles by Mohan, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Placing social capital

John Mohan

University of Portsmouth, Department of Geography, Buckingham Building, Lion Terrace, Portsmouth PO1 3HE, UK

This paper reviews the contribution that the concept of social capital might make to geography, and the contribution geography might make to the analysis of social capital. We begin by summarizing the conceptual origins and dimensions of social capital, in the process of which we distinguish it from several other social properties (human and cultural capital; social networks). We then summarize key criticisms of the concept, especially those levelled at the work of Robert Putnam. The core of the paper is a discussion of the issue of whether there might be a geography of social capital. We consider links between geographical debates and the concept of social capital, and we assess the difficulties of deriving spatially disaggregated measures of social capital. We illustrate this discussion with reference to literature on three sets of issues: the question of ‘institutional tissue’ and its effects on regional development; the understanding of health inequalities; and the analysis of comparative government performance. In conclusion, we argue that the popularity of the concept reflects a combination of academic and political developments, notably the search for ostensibly ‘costless’ policies of redistribution on the part of centrist governments. We therefore conclude with a discussion of the practical applications of the concept in different contexts.

Key Words: social capital • social policy • development • voluntarism • participation • welfare

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 26, No. 2, 191-210 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph364ra


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Holt Embodied social capital and geographic perspectives: performing the habitus Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 227 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Triantafyllopoulos Does Land Property Structure Affect Local Development Patterns? Evidence from a Greek Tourist Area Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 797 - 824. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Murphy Building Trust in Economic Space Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2006; 30(4): 427 - 450. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Middleton, A. Murie, and R. Groves Social Capital and Neighbourhoods that Work Urban Stud, September 1, 2005; 42(10): 1711 - 1738. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. A. Radcliffe Geography of development: development, civil society and inequality - social capital is (almost) dead? Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2004; 28(4): 517 - 527. [PDF]

				H V Z Tunstall, M Shaw, and D Dorling Places and health J Epidemiol Community Health, January 1, 2004; 58(1): 6 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. R. Fyfe and C. Milligan Out of the shadows: exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2003; 27(4): 397 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mohan Geography and social policy: spatial divisions of welfare Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2003; 27(3): 363 - 374. [PDF]