Progress in Human Geography

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, N.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 26, No. 3, 313-332 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph372ra
© 2002 SAGE Publications

Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy

Nick Evans

Department of Geography, University College Worcester, Henwick Grove, Worcester WR2 6AJ, UK

Carol Morris

Countryside and Community Research Unit, University of Gloucestershire, Francis Close Hall, Cheltenham GL50 4AZ, UK

Michael Winter

School of Geography, University of Exeter, CRR, Lafrowda House, Exeter EX4 6TL, UK

It has become fashionable to conceptualize recent shifts in agrarian priorities as a ‘postproductivist’ transition from a previously ‘productivist’ agriculture. This notion became more popular throughout the 1990s as a way to capture in one convenient package the complex changes experienced by both the agricultural sector specifically and within rural areas more generally. However, the widespread and uncritical use of such an all-encompassing term is rather surprising given debates elsewhere in human geography on the rejection of dualistic thinking. Yet, in agricultural and rural studies, the active creation and reinforcement of a productivist/post-productivist dualism has emerged as a means of explaining the uneven development of rural areas. This paper develops a critique of post-productivism to demonstrate its invalidity, presenting empirical evidence to refute five supposed characteristics relating to quality food, pluriactivity, sustainability, production dispersion and regulation. It is argued that future progress in agricultural research will only be made if post-productivism is abandoned. Effort should be refocused upon understanding deeper processes underpinning agricultural change using existing theoretical perspectives developed in human geography but which lack application in the agricultural context. Ecological modernization is provided as a brief exemplar of how such progress may be achieved.

Key Words: agricultural change • ecological modernization • post-productivism • rural studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. Halfacree
From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2006; 30(3): 309 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ECON GEOGRHome page
R. Sonnino and T. Marsden
Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe
J. Econ. Geogr., April 1, 2006; 6(2): 181 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. McCarthy
Rural geography: multifunctional rural geographies - reactionary or radical?
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2005; 29(6): 773 - 782.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
G. Wilson
Book Review: Multifunctional agriculture: a new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2005; 29(6): 807 - 809.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Potter and M. Tilzey
Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 581 - 600.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. Winter
Geographies of food: agro-food geographies - food, nature, farmers and agency
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 609 - 617.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
D. C. H. Watts, B. Ilbery, and D. Maye
Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision
Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2005; 29(1): 22 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. S. Zimmerer
Cultural ecology: placing households in human-environment studies - the cases of tropical forest transitions and agrobiodiversity change
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2004; 28(6): 795 - 806.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. Phillips
Other geographies of gentrification
Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2004; 28(1): 5 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
G. A. Wiilson and J. Rigg
'Post-productivist' agricultural regimes and the South: discordant concepts?
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2003; 27(6): 681 - 707.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. Roche
Rural geography: a stock tally of 2002
Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2003; 27(6): 779 - 786.
[PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
M. Winter
Geographies of food: agro-food geographies making reconnections
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2003; 27(4): 505 - 513.
[PDF]