Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Human Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Anima urbis

Jennifer Wolch

University of Southern California, 3620 South Vermont Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0255, USA

Geographers have long neglected the role of nature in shaping the urban experience. Yet the anima urbis – the breath, life, soul and spirit of the city – is embodied in its animal as well as human life forms. Recent work focused on human-animal relations has begun to re-animate analyses of the city. Such studies range widely, exploring, for example: historical and literary perspectives on the place of animals in the city; links between urban institutions such as zoos and colonialism, nationalism and racial identity formation; negotiations around human-wildlife interactions at the urban fringe; and gender and cultural diversity in attitudes toward animals in world cities. In addition, geographers have begun to consider animals and the urban moral landscape, and assess competing rubrics of planning practice as they relate to animals in the city. Together, these efforts suggest a research agenda for urban geographers interested in human-animal relations, that may help bridge gaps between human and physical geography, and propel the study of nature-society relations to the fore in urban geography.

Key Words: animals • biogeography • cities • cultural animal geography • transspecies urban theory • zoögeography.

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 26, No. 6, 721-742 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph400oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Morris and L. Holloway
Genetic technologies and the transformation of the geographies of UK livestock agriculture: a research agenda
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2009; 33(3): 313 - 333.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. Johnston
Beyond the clearing: towards a dwelt animal geography
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2008; 32(5): 633 - 649.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
B. Braun
Environmental issues: writing a more-than-human urban geography
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 635 - 650.
[PDF]