This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Castree, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Economy and culture are dead! Long live economy and culture!

School of Geography, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

This essay critically evaluates the debate in human geography and cognate fields about economy-culture relationships. It takes issue with the terms of the debate, wherein different authors have sought to ground their claims about economy and culture with reference to supposed ‘ontological realities’. Building on the arguments of Don Mitchell (1995; 2000), I argue that economy and culture should be seen as two powerful ideas that help to create the realities they seem only to describe. Economy and culture cannot, I argue, be uncritically invoked by academic analysts as either objects of analysis or explanatory resources. Rather, we need to inquire into how the ideas of economy and culture are semantically ‘fixed’ and with reference to what ‘real-world’ phenomena. Taking the case of indigenous peoples' deployment of the idea of ‘cultural property’, I illustrate the kind of research agenda that follows from seeing ‘economy’ and ‘culture’ as two performative signifiers. I also challenge those involved in the economy-culture debate to take seriously their own role in sustaining, altering or eclipsing the various meanings and referents of these two powerful key words.

Key Words: economy • culture • knowledge-class • ontology • discourse • cultural property • indigenous peoples

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 28, No. 2, 204-226 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132504ph468oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Ribera-Fumaz From urban political economy to cultural political economy: rethinking culture and economy in and beyond the urban Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 447 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Prytherch New Euroregional Territories, Old Catalanist Dreams?: Articulating Culture, Economy and Territory In the Mediterranean Arc European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2009; 16(2): 131 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Head Cultural ecology: the problematic human and the terms of engagement Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2007; 31(6): 837 - 846. [PDF]

				A. Amin and N. Thrift Cultural-economy and cities Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 143 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Gibson and L. Kong Cultural economy: a critical review Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 541 - 561. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Winter Geographies of food: agro-food geographies - food, nature, farmers and agency Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 609 - 617. [PDF]

				R. Johnston Learning our history from our pioneers: UK academic geographers in the Oxford dictionary of national biography Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2005; 29(5): 651 - 667. [PDF]