Economy and culture are dead! Long live economy and culture!School of Geography, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK This essay critically evaluates the debate in human geography and cognate fields about economy-culture relationships. It takes issue with the terms of the debate, wherein different authors have sought to ground their claims about economy and culture with reference to supposed ontological realities. Building on the arguments of Don Mitchell (1995; 2000), I argue that economy and culture should be seen as two powerful ideas that help to create the realities they seem only to describe. Economy and culture cannot, I argue, be uncritically invoked by academic analysts as either objects of analysis or explanatory resources. Rather, we need to inquire into how the ideas of economy and culture are semantically fixed and with reference to what real-world phenomena. Taking the case of indigenous peoples' deployment of the idea of cultural property, I illustrate the kind of research agenda that follows from seeing economy and culture as two performative signifiers. I also challenge those involved in the economy-culture debate to take seriously their own role in sustaining, altering or eclipsing the various meanings and referents of these two powerful key words.
Key Words: economy culture knowledge-class ontology discourse cultural property indigenous peoples
Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 28, No. 2,
204-226 (2004) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

