| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1191/0309132505ph546oa Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integrationDepartment of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, 507 McCone Hall #4740, Berkeley, CA 94720-4740, USA Scale has emerged as a major issue in both ecology and geography in recent decades. Little effort has been made to compare these parallel debates, however, or to seek an integrated conception of scale across the two disciplines. This paper argues that such an integration is possible, even between ecology and human geographythe subfield of geography seemingly most removed from ecological concerns and methods. In both disciplines, globalization has lent practical urgency to problems of scale, revealing deeper theoretical issues. Geographers have helped impel ecologists to take space and scale seriously, and the epistemological insight that scale is produced (rather than given a priori) should be applied to ecological as well as social phenomena. Ecologists' conceptual distinctions and methodological guidelines regarding scale, meanwhile, can help resolve `the scale question' in critical human geography. Scale is both a methodological issue inherent to observation (its epistemological moment) and an objective characteristic of complex interactions within and among social and natural processes (its ontological moment). These processes and interactionsrather than scale per seshould be the object of research, with particular attention to nonlinearities or thresholds of change.
Key Words: ecological scale geographical scale human geography rangeland ecology scaling effects thresholds
|