This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mansfield, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Beyond rescaling: reintegrating the `national' as a dimension of scalar relations

Department of Geography, Ohio State University, 1036 Derby Hall, 154 North Oval Mall, Columbus OH 43210, USA

Among scholars of globalization and neoliberalism, there has been a marked turn away from the national as a relevant scale in today's world, with researchers arguing that the national is being `rescaled' to local, regional and global scales. This paper argues that we need to move beyond this rescaling argument to recognize that the national still is relevant in contemporary political economy. Seeing the national not as a discrete scale but as a dimension of political economic practice is an alternative analytical approach that treats the national as constitutively implicated in other scaled activities. Distinctions between one scale and another are not so clear. This approach enhances our understanding of contemporary patterns and processes because, instead of focusing on one set of scales or another, analysis can reveal relations among multiple scales. This approach also moves us beyond the historical periodization posited in the rescaling literature. Instead of providing descriptions of contemporary change in which the dominant national is giving way to a messier configuration of global and local scales, the idea of scales-as-dimensions offers a way of analysing scalar relations more generally. This can then be used in both contemporary and historical analysis. The rescaling argument treats the national largely as residual, which serves to draw our attention away from complex scalar practices without offering a truly different way of thinking about scalar relations.

Key Words: globalization • national • neoliberalism • rescaling • scale

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 29, No. 4, 458-473 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132505ph560oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Beer National Capital Bureaucracy as a Spatial Phenomenon: The Place of Canberra Within the Australian Public Service Administration Society, October 1, 2009; 41(6): 693 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Johnson Cross-Border Regions and Territorial Restructuring in Central Europe: Room for More transboundary Space European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2009; 16(2): 177 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Pearce and S. Ayres Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development Agencies Urban Stud, March 1, 2009; 46(3): 537 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Brenner Open questions on state rescaling Cambridge J Regions Econ Soc, March 1, 2009; 2(1): 123 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Cumbers, C. Nativel, and P. Routledge Labour agency and union positionalities in global production networks J. Econ. Geogr., May 1, 2008; 8(3): 369 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Moore Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 203 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Faulconbridge London's and New York's Advertising and Law Clusters and their Networks of Learning: Relational Analyses with a Politics of Scale? Urban Stud, August 1, 2007; 44(9): 1635 - 1656. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Sidaway Spaces of postdevelopment Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 345 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. E. Hopkins Young people, masculinities, religion and race: new social geographies Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 163 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				l. Deas and A. Lord From a New Regionalism to an Unusual Regionalism? The Emergence of Non-standard Regional Spaces and Lessons for the Territorial Reorganisation of the State Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1847 - 1877. [Abstract] [PDF]