This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Newman, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our `borderless' world

Department of Politics and Government, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheba, Israel

The study of borders has undergone a renaissance during the past decade. This is reflected in an impressive list of conferences, workshops and scholarly publications. This renaissance has been partly due to the emergence of a counternarrative to the borderless and deterritorialized world discourse which has accompanied much of globalization theory. The study of borders has moved beyond the limited confines of the political geography discourse, crossing its own disciplinary boundaries, to include sociologists, political scientists, historians, international lawyers and scholars of international relations. But this meeting of disciplines has not yet been successful in creating a common language or glossary of terms which is relevant to all scholars of borders. Central to the contemporary study of borders are notions such as `borders are institutions', the process of `bordering' as a dynamic in its own right, and the border terminologies which focus on the binary distinctions between the `us' and `them', the `included' and the `excluded'. Borders should be studied not only from a top-down perspective, but also from the bottom up, with a focus on the individual border narratives and experiences, reflecting the ways in which borders impact upon the daily life practices of people living in and around the borderland and transboundary transition zones. In positing an agenda for the next generation of border-related research, borders should be seen for their potential to constitute bridges and points of contact, as much as they have traditionally constituted barriers to movement and communication.

Key Words: border as institution • border as process • border narratives • borderlands • borders • boundaries • interdisciplinary discourse • power relations

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 30, No. 2, 143-161 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph599xx


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Antonsich On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen Progress in Human Geography, December 1, 2009; 33(6): 789 - 806. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Jones Categories, borders and boundaries Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 174 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. S. Zimmerer Cultural ecology (and political ecology) in the 'environmental borderlands': exploring the expanded connectivities within geography Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 227 - 244. [PDF]