This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grabher, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of `networks' between economic sociology and economic geography

Socio-Economics of Space, University of Bonn, Meckenheimer Allee 166, 53115 Bonn, Germany

In economic geography the notion of the network has come to play a critical role in a range of debates. Yet networks are rarely construed in an explicit fashion. They are, rather, assumed as some sort of more enduring social relations. This paper seeks to foreground these implicit assumptions - and their limitations - by tracing the selective engagement of economic geography with network approaches in economic sociology. The perception of networks in economic geography is mainly informed by the network governance approach that is founded on Mark Granovetter's notion of embeddedness. By embracing the network governance approach, economic geography bypassed the older tradition of the social network approach. Economic geography thus discarded not only the concerns for network position and structure but also more calculative and strategic perceptions of networks prevailing in Ron Burt's work. Beyond these two dominant traditions, economic geography has, more recently, started to tinker with the poststructuralist metaphor of the rhizome of actor-network theory while it took no notice of Harrison White's notions of publics and polymorphous network domains.

Key Words: interdisciplinarity • network governance approach • networks • publics • rhizome • social network analysis

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 30, No. 2, 163-189 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph600oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Kratke Regional Knowledge Networks: A Network Analysis Approach To the Interlinking of Knowledge Resources European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 2010; 17(1): 83 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pike Geographies of brands and branding Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 619 - 645. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Berndt and M. Boeckler Geographies of circulation and exchange: constructions of markets Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2009; 33(4): 535 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. W.-c. Yeung Transnationalizing entrepreneurship: a critical agenda for economic geography Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 210 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. W.-c. Yeung Managing network resources: alliances, affiliations and other relational assets J. Econ. Geogr., January 1, 2008; 8(1): 130 - 133. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gluckler Economic geography and the evolution of networks J. Econ. Geogr., September 1, 2007; 7(5): 619 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Reimer Geographies of production I Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2007; 31(2): 245 - 255. [PDF]