Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information on Population and Society

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Progress in Human Geography
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warren, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perspectives on the `alien' versus `native' species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice

Charles R. Warren

School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AL, UK, charles.warren{at}st-andrews.co.uk

The classification of species as either `native' or `alien' is one of the organizing principles of conservation, but the validity of this dualism has increasingly been questioned, sparking debates which raise quintessentially geographical questions about place, space, nature and humanity-nature interactions. This discussion reviews the key criticisms of the native/alien construct, including its spatiotemporally arbitrary character, its disturbingly xenophobic associations, the logical problems of attributing native or alien status to our own species, and the ethical disjunction between the promotion of a multicultural human society and the persecution of `foreign' species. Given that the native/alien polarity is a subset of the discredited nature/culture duality, its conceptual foundations seem irredeemably fractured. An alternative framework based on a `damage criterion' rather than putative biogeographical origins is advocated.

Key Words: alien species • biogeography • conservation policy • native species.

Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 31, No. 4, 427-446 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0309132507079499
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. R. Warren
Using the native/alien classification for description not prescription: a response to Christopher Preston
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 711 - 713.
[PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
C. D. Preston
The terms 'native' and 'alien' -- a biogeographical perspective
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 702 - 711.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
L. Head and J. Atchison
Cultural ecology: emerging human-plant geographies
Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 236 - 245.
[PDF]

Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
D.M. Richardson, P. Pysek, D. Simberloff, M. Rejmanek, and A.D. Mader
Biological invasions - the widening debate: a response to Charles Warren
Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2008; 32(2): 295 - 298.
[PDF]